Posts About Results

CSSP is proud to release its 2013 annual report, focused on equity. We believe that good outcomes for children, families and communities can only be achieved if we're aware of, attuned to and have the knowledge and skills to tackle inequity.

 All children, regardless of race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, socioeconomic status or the neighborhood in which they live – deserve to be healthy, to enter school ready to learn and to become young adults who are prepared to succeed in life and in the world. And CSSP’s policy work understands that meaningful policy requires a focus on those who face the most significant barriers to opportunity and that no public policy is race or ethnicity neutral.

The report highlights disparities that exist in the outcomes central to our mission, the work we have pursued to address inequities and action steps we can all take in various spheres to produce a level playing field with opportunities for all. 

 Also noted in the report is a spotlight on policyforresults.org, which was completely revamped in 2013. You’ll find that the new site is focused on providing guidance for policymakers – with a particular emphasis on addressing racial and other disparities – and on achieving equity.

Check out CSSP’s 2013 Annual Report below!

Posted In: Data, Results

Measuring Opportunity: The Opportunity Index

· Natasya Gandana

The release of the 2013-2014 Opportunity Index findings show positive trends overall, with a modest improvement in the average opportunity score of 2.6 percent since 2010. Other significant highlights include: 26 states and Washington, DC improved their opportunity scores, a decline in the unemployment rate nationwide, increased access to internet in all 50 states and Washington, DC, and a decrease in violent crime in 44 states. However, only two states, Connecticut and New Mexico, saw statistically significant declines in their opportunity scores between 2011 and 2013. Most states improved or maintained their scores in the “jobs and local economy” and “education” categories, while the weakest progress was found within the “community health” and “civic life” categories.

Overall, states with the highest scores have demonstrated strong investments in their residents through education and job attainment and have maintained a strong commitment to improving opportunity for all.

 Among state rankings:

  • In opportunity score, Vermont ranked highest at 65.9, while Nevada ranked lowest at 37.9
  • In economy, North Dakota ranked highest at 64.86, while Mississippi ranked lowest at 37.47
  • In education, New Jersey ranked highest at 63.39, while Nevada ranked lowest at 25.91
  • In community, Vermont ranked highest at 74.88, while Nevada ranked lowest at 42.81

 The District of Columbia experienced the most significant changes in terms of positive growth in jobs and local economy and education. DC experienced consistent improvements in variables within these categories, including an increase in wages and a significant improvement of 3.9 percent in preschool attendance. Most importantly, DC experienced a decrease in income inequality over the past three years and is the only state to do so. Additionally, DC demonstrated a 4.2 percent increase in the percentage of the population with an associate’s degree or higher, which is almost double the increase of any other state. One notable finding in DC however, shows that the percentage of 3 and 4-year olds enrolled in preschool is greater than the percentage of students who graduate high school in four years.

 The Opportunity Index provides policymakers and community leaders with information to advance opportunity-related issues, to advocate for positive change, and to track progress over time. It allows policymakers and leaders to identify areas for improvement and to gauge progress over time. Developed by Measure of America and Opportunity Nation, the Opportunity Index was created in an effort to redefine the national conversation regarding the definition of “opportunity” and the American Dream.

 Additionally, the Index highlights the increasing importance of geography and its impact on individual opportunity as it relates to poverty and mobility. The general consensus maintains that through hard work and ambition, anyone can succeed in the United States and obtain the American dream. However, the opportunity index demonstrates why that is no longer the case. “Personal responsibility” is weighing in at a smaller amount than it used to. Enrolling in college or finding a job can be difficult if there are no affordable colleges or available jobs nearby. Increasingly, a person’s zip code can predetermine opportunity and success, and the index is a step towards proving that it shouldn’t have to. 

 For a more in-depth analysis of the findings, please click here.

Posted In: Results, Data

Obsessed or Just Relentless?

· Frank Farrow

Earlier this month, Washington Post education reporter Valerie Strauss posted a blog asking if the U.S. Department of Education is “obsessed with data” when it comes to their Promise Neighborhoods grantees.

The answer is, yeah, kind of.

But we’d argue the real obsession is with results.

Focusing on specific indicators means focusing on progress. What the government is doing is creating a new level of accountability. Of shared accountability that every partner in every Promise Neighborhood site is clear about.

Why are they doing this? Because to make sure that every child in a low-income neighborhood has the opportunity to get to and graduate from college means everyone involved has to understand what’s going on. Everyone has to be on the same page. And unless you’re tracking along the way – watching data on daily school attendance or critical milestones like reading well by the end of third grade – you risk waiting until kids fail to realize there’s a problem.

Another reason the focus on data and results is so important? It makes for much more efficient use of the resources at hand. Because as Strauss points out, there’s far less funding for Promise Neighborhoods than other education initiatives.

And so yes, it might take some time to get some of the details worked out on the best indicators organizations should be collecting and reporting. But it’s all part of a bigger picture. 

Working with each of these communities, we know what’s at stake. We’re glad the Department of Education, neighborhood stakeholders, parents and everyone else who touches the lives of children in Promise Neighborhoods are relentless about results. It’s because they all understand what the end goal is.

And we’d argue that’s something worth being obsessed with!


Frank Farrow is the director of the Center for the Study of Social Policy, the training and technical assistance provider for the federal Promise Neighbhorhoods initiative.

 

Posted In: Youth, Education, Results, Data

Earlier today, the U.S. Census Bureau released the 2012 data on income, poverty, and health insurance coverage. For the second consecutive year, neither the official poverty rate nor the number of people in poverty at the national level were statistically different from the previous year’s estimates—the poverty rate remained at 15 percent – amounting to 46.5 million people living in poverty. While there was not an increase in the poverty rate, the 2012 data still indicated significant racial disparities in both poverty and income. The poverty rates among non-Hispanic Whites and Asians were 9.7 percent and 11.7 percent respectively, while the poverty rates for Blacks and Hispanics were 27.2 percent and 25.6 percent respectively.

Poverty and Income Data Highlights

  • The percent of people in deep poverty, with incomes below 50% of the poverty threshold, remained at 6.6 percent from 2011, which is still a substantial increase from the 5.2 percent rate seen in 2006 and 2007 (prior to the recession) and even from the data collected in 1967 where deep poverty was at 4.4 percent.
  • The poverty rates for children, those under the age of 18, was 21.8 percent, not statistically different from 2011.
  • Median household income in 2012 was $51,017, not statistically different from the 2011 median income of $51,100.

Health Insurance Data Highlights

  • The percentage of people without health insurance coverage decreased to 15.4 percent from 15.7 percent between 2011 and 2012, while the number of uninsured people in 2012 was not statistically different from 2011, at 48 million people.
  • The percentage and number of people covered by government health insurance increased to 32.6 percent and 101.5 million people in 2012 up slightly from 32.2 percent and 99.5 million people in 2011.
  • The percentage of Asians and Hispanics without health insurance decreased from 16.8 percent and 30.1 percent to 15.1 percent and 29.1 percent respectively.
  • The percentage of uninsured children decreased from 9.4 percent to 8.9 percent in 2012.

Safety Net Programs

  • Unemployment insurance was able to raise 1.7 million people out of poverty in 2012.
  • Social Security income helped 15.3 million people aged 65 and older out of poverty in 2012 – if these payments were excluded - it would quadruple the number of elderly people living in poverty.
  • The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), while not included in the poverty calculations used for the data today, if considered, would have reduced the number of people in poverty by 4 million people in 2012.
  • The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) also reduced the number of children classified as living in poverty in 2012 by 2.9 million children.

The Important Role of Public Policy. Public policy helps create pipelines of educational opportunity and new jobs. It also creates the supports and services that help poor individuals and families while they work toward those opportunities. As evident in the data, the most noticeable statistic changes that occurred in 2012 were in health insurance coverage – with the number of uninsured children dropping from 9.4 percent to 8.9 percent in 2012.  This demonstrates the critical value of policies that make a public investment in children and families. Public investments have proven to have a real impact on reducing poverty – and subsequently improving the quality of life for millions of children and families. Unfortunately, the $85 billion in cuts to supports and services as a result of sequestration are likely to only exacerbate the conditions of poverty and increase the percentage of those living in unacceptable conditions – unable to meet their basic needs.

The Need for a Focus on Equity. The racial disparities in the poverty data indicate that Black and Hispanic families have continued to have disproportionately higher poverty rates and lower incomes compared to White families, which has been consistent for more than three decades. This inequity shows the need for innovative solutions and public investments aimed at supporting real change.  Policy strategies should take into account the existence of disparate opportunities and outcomes—attention to equity creates solutions that best meet the needs of the entire community.

To read CSSP's Statement on the New Poverty Data and Implications for Children and Families please click here.

For more strategies to Ensure Children Grow Up in Safe, Supportive and Economically Successful Families visit PolicyforResults.org.

Posted In: Federal Budget, Poverty and Economic Stability, Results
The 50th Anniversary of the March on Washington that took place last Wednesday highlighted significant areas of progress, while also drawing attention to the advancements that still need to be made. Although there are many reasons to celebrate, including equal access to public accommodations, laws against racial discrimination and employment and African American voting rights as a result of the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the hard economic goals of the march that were critical to transforming the life opportunities of African Americans have not entirely been achieved.

In fact, there are growing economic divides, and despite the important protections established through the law, discrimination has taken new forms. Fifty years after the march, and 45 years after the passage of the Fair Housing Act, major banks still discriminate on the basis of race through predatory practices and lending activities. For example, an investigation into the nation’s largest home mortgage lender, found that the bank charged higher fees and rates to more than 30,000 minority borrowers across the country than they had to white borrowers who posed the same credit risk. Another concern related to housing can be seen when you look at the population in homeless shelters. African Americans make up 40 percent of the population living in homeless shelters, while comprising of only 13 percent of the U.S. population.

The inequality extends to other areas of financial security – including other types of assets and income. In the last 30 years, there has been no significant progress in closing the gap between the income of African Americans or Hispanics and white Americans. In 2011, the median income for African American families was $40,495, just 58 percent of the median income of white families. By 2009, the median wealth of white families was 20 times that of African American families. The Great Recession also had a disproportionate impact on African Americans—the median wealth among African American households dropped by 53 percent between 2005 and 2009, and the poverty rate increased to 27.6 percent by 2011, 3 times the poverty rate for white households that year at 9.8 percent. About 65 percent of African-American children live in low-income families—45 percent of which live in communities with concentrated poverty, as opposed to 12 percent for white children. Living in neighborhoods of concentrated poverty can significantly impact the lives of children and their families.  Concentrated poverty is closely linked with many social and economic challenges, including behavioral problems in young children, higher crime rates, and environmental hazards that impact health.

Discrimination is also still prevalent in the job market. Research shows that applicants with “African American sounding” names get 50 percent fewer calls for interviews, and are twice as likely to be unemployed. In 2012, the African American unemployment rate was 14.0 percent, 2.1 times the white unemployment rate at 6.6 percent, and even higher than the national unemployment rate during the Great Depression from 1929 to 1939 (13.1 percent). 

Despite being the land of opportunity, many young children growing up in America are dependent on their parents’ income and education to determine the probability of their success into adulthood. Unfortunately, discrimination and lack of education and job opportunity is often persistent from one generation to the next, which limits the opportunities for improving future outcomes. The good news is – there are ways for public policy to begin to address the inequities that still exist. In keeping with the progress that has already been made, improving equitable access to decent housing, maintaining high-quality, integrated education, creating opportunities for equitable early childhood initiatives and creating a federal jobs program for full employment are all policy options aimed at advancing equity. To read the report on The Unfinished March by the Economic Policy Institute, click here. 
Posted In: Education, Poverty and Economic Stability, Community Change, Results